Lengthy-term acute care hospital closures might have unintended penalties for affected person care

Lengthy-term acute care hospitals (LTCHs) are frequent websites of post-acute look after sufferers recovering from extreme respiratory failure requiring long-term mechanical air flow. Due to longer lengths of keep in comparison with common, short-stay hospitals, the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) reimburses LTCHs at larger charges. Nonetheless, since 2005, CMS applied a sequence of reforms designed to limit their development and curb spending leading to many LTCH closings.

Whereas it was unclear whether or not these closures affected affected person care patterns at short-stay hospitals and general affected person final result, a brand new research from researchers at Boston College Chobanian & Avedisian Faculty of Medication, has discovered that discharge patterns modified whereas general spending on mechanically ventilated sufferers decreased following LTCH closures.

In line with the researchers, CMS fee reform was meant to divert less-sick, less-complex sufferers from higher-cost LTCHs to lower-cost expert nursing services, whereas reserving LTCHs for complicated sufferers like these on extended mechanical air flow.

However as a result of the downstream impact was for some LTCHs to shut fully, we discovered that LTCH closures affected some in-hospital and discharge practices in unintended methods. For instance, at hospitals that relied on a closing LTCH, folks receiving extended mechanical air flow had been discharged to expert nursing services extra typically. These are sufferers that CMS reform meant to maintain at LTCHs, and it isn’t recognized if expert nursing services are as well-equipped to deal with the complexities of long-term mechanical air flow.”

Anica Regulation, MD, MS, corresponding writer assistant professor of medication, Boston College Chobanian & Avedisian Faculty of Medication

To estimate how CMS fee reform and subsequent LTCH closures may have an effect on hospital apply patterns and affected person outcomes, the researchers recognized all of the LTCHs that closed within the final decade. They then in contrast outcomes at hospitals that had a detailed relationship with a closing LTCH (within the 12 months earlier than and after LTCH closure) to matched hospitals that didn’t use closing LTCHs. Whereas most hospitals weren’t impacted by LTCH closure, those that had been noticed fewer LTCH transfers and decreased spending on mechanically ventilated sufferers. Additional, amongst sufferers who required extended mechanical air flow, code standing modifications to “don’t resuscitate” (DNR) additionally elevated, presumably associated to the lower in post-acute facility availability for long-term care. They didn’t see important modifications in mortality.

“It is reassuring that mortality didn’t change after LTCH closures, however will probably be essential to discover whether or not there are different essential variations in outcomes, akin to complication charges, affected person/household satisfaction, and practical rehabilitation due to modifications in discharge location. It is also essential to discover whether or not will increase in DNR charges are literally what sufferers and their households need, or if that occurs resulting from pressures from having fewer discharge choices,” added Regulation, who is also a pulmonary and important care doctor at Boston Medical Middle.

These findings seem on-line in JAMA Community Open.

Funding for this research was supplied by the Nationwide Institute of Well being (NIH)/Nationwide Coronary heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) K23HL153482, Nationwide Middle for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) 1KL2TR001411, the Doris Duke Charitable Basis, the Boston College Evans Junior School Advantage Award, and the Boston College Chobanian & Avedisian Faculty of Medication Division of Medication Profession Funding Award.