The news of quarterback Kyle McCord entering the transfer portal may have come as a surprise to many Ohio State fans. After leading the team to an 11-1 record and putting up impressive statistics, McCord’s decision raised questions about the future of the program. According to Pete Nakos, an On3 reporter, the decision was influenced by Ohio State coach Ryan Day’s reluctance to commit to McCord as the starting quarterback for the 2024 season. Nakos discussed this and more in an episode of the Andy Staples On3 podcast.
Despite McCord’s strong performance on the field, Day did not guarantee him the starting job for the next season. With another talented player, Devin Brown, competing for the position, Day was in a difficult position after the team’s recent losses to Michigan. This uncertainty led McCord to seek opportunities elsewhere for the betterment of Ohio State. Additionally, wide receiver Julian Fleming also entered the transfer portal due to uncertainty regarding playing time in a crowded receivers room.
While McCord and Fleming’s decisions are disappointing to the Buckeyes and their fans, Nakos believes the players acted in their best interests by making early decisions. By making these moves early, both players have the opportunity to explore new opportunities while Ohio State can plan their approach to the quarterback position. With the current landscape of college football, transfer portal movements have become increasingly common, and McCord and Fleming’s decisions are a reflection of this trend.
Nakos also highlighted the influence of name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals on player decisions. With NIL dollars in play, players like McCord have to be proactive in seeking new opportunities since many of the spaces in other programs may already be taken. Ultimately, these developments indicate a change in the college football landscape, with both players and programs having to adapt to the evolving nature of the sport.
In conclusion, Nakos’ insights shed light on the factors that led to McCord and Fleming’s decisions to enter the transfer portal. Their departures signal the challenges faced by college football programs and players in navigating the transfer portal era. Additionally, these developments highlight the increasingly influential role of NIL and the changing dynamics of college football.